Letter to Constituents – February 9, 2010
Posted by Susan Aumann in General, Legislative UpdatesFebruary 9, 2010
Dear Constituents,
Another week in Annapolis proved to be less then exciting and exposing more of our fiscal problems to come.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Bond bills are introduced each year that aim to support specific projects in the State. These capital projects must serve a wide spectrum of public purposes. The bonds that are issued are General Obligations bonds and are sold with a single coupon rate of 5% for 15 years. The debt service for the General Obligations bonds are funded almost entirely through property taxes. In Appendix F of the 2010 Budget Highlights has a worrisome note that the “Property tax collections are not expected to keep up with the debt service payments, thus requiring additional general funds effective in Fiscal Year 2011.” If the State of Maryland accepts more Bond Bills and increases our General Obligations, the funding of the debt service may increase property taxes. This year, Fiscal Year 2012, the O’Malley administration has provided $15,000,000 in the budget for Bond Bills.
Cutting back on grants and bonds when the State is facing debt service requirements that will out-pace property tax revenues is a sensible action to take.
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
In 2009 the General Assembly passed an expansion of the Unemployment Benefits, HB 740 which will take effect in October 1, 2010. This expansion has caused many businesses to realize up to 300% increase in their bi monthly payments. Unemployment benefits are paid by the employer in the form of unemployment taxes, any increase in benefits necessitates an increase in taxes on business.
House Bill 740 expanded the Unemployment benefits to part time workers. The Department of Legislative Services Issue Papers, 2010 Legislative Session, states “Maryland employers will pay from the highest tax rate table for calendar 2010 due to the low balance of the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.” When the funds are fully depleted, states may borrow from the Federal Government’s unemployment trust fund. The amount borrowed should be paid back within one year in order to prevent interest from accruing. Under the Obama plan states were required to amend their UI statute in-order to qualify for additional funds. These changes would include: (1) making part time workers eligible for benefits; (2) providing coverage to individuals who separate from work for compelling family reasons (illness of a family member, safety reasons due to domestic violence, change in spouse’s employment location); (3) providing Workforce Investment Act training benefits for at least 26 weeks in high demand industries; or (4) adding a $15 weekly allowance to UI payments for dependents.
Read the rest of this entry »
Comments Off





Entries (RSS)